The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-1120•In re: Henry Earl Miller, a/k/a Stef, a/k/a Stefan
22-1120Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 7, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1120
In re: HENRY EARL MILLER, a/k/a Stef, a/k/a Stefan,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (6:04-cr-00022-JMC-3)
Submitted: February 15, 2022 Decided: March 7, 2022
Before THACKER, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Henry Earl Miller, Petitioner Pro Se. Brandon Batson Hinton, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Henry Earl Miller petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court
has unduly delayed in ruling on his writ of error coram nobis. He seeks an order from this
court directing the district court to act. The present record does not reveal undue delay in
the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.