The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-1134•Courtney Lamont Edmond v. Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC
22-1134Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 24, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1134
COURTNEY LAMONT EDMOND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WELLS FARGO CLEARING SERVICES, LLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:21-cv-00139-JAG)
Submitted: September 22, 2022 Decided: September 26, 2022
Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Courtney Lamont Edmond, Appellant Pro Se. Frederick Thomas Smith, SEYFARTH
SHAW, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Courtney Lamont Edmond appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s
motion for summary judgment in Edmond’s civil action filed pursuant to Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17, and 42 U.S.C.
§ 1981. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s judgment. Edmond v. Wells Fargo Clearing Servs., No. 3:21-cv-00139-
JAG (E.D. Va. Feb. 3, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.