The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-1162•Nishith Patel v. Honorable Anne Albright; Honorable Mary Ellen Barbera; Honorable Stuart Berger
22-1162Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 3, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1162
NISHITH PATEL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HONORABLE ANNE ALBRIGHT; HONORABLE MARY ELLEN BARBERA;
HONORABLE STUART BERGER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:21-cv-02409-GJH)
Submitted: December 29, 2022 Decided: February 3, 2023
Before WILKINSON and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nishith Patel, Appellant Pro Se. Kathryn Elizabeth Hummel, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nishith Patel appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s order. Patel v. Albright, No. 8:21-cv-02409-GJH (D. Md. Oct. 26,
2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.