Tracey Diane Colquitt v. Bon Secours Mercy Health, d/b/a St. Francis Nursing Center

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1288
TRACEY DIANE COLQUITT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BON SECOURS MERCY HEALTH, d/b/a St. Francis Nursing Center;
DOMINQUE HAWKINS; TAMIKA GREENE; BRIELLE ROBERSON; ST.
FRANCIS NURSING CENTER,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
IRVIN LAND,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Newport News. Roderick Charles Young, District Judge. (4:21-cv-00053-RCY-RJK)
Submitted: December 20, 2022 Decided: December 22, 2022
Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Tracey Diane Colquitt, Appellant Pro Se. Laura May Hooe, Kathleen Mary McCauley,
MORAN, REEVES & CONN, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Tracey Diane Colquitt appeals the district court’s order dismissing her second
amended complaint alleging retaliation, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17, the Age Discrimination in
Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634, the Americans with Disabilities Act of
1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213 (“ADA”), and Virginia Code § 40.1-27.3; and failure
to accommodate her disability, in violation of the ADA. Confining our review to the issues
raised in the informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177
(4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules,
our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”), we have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Colquitt’s motion for appointment of
counsel and affirm the district court’s judgment. Colquitt v. Bon Secours Mercy Health,
No. 4:21-cv-00053-RCY-RJK (E.D. Va. Feb. 16, 2022). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --