The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-1439•Vivek Pisal v. K12, Inc.
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1439
VIVEK PISAL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
K12, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Rossie David Alston, Jr., District Judge. (1:21-cv-00506-RDA-JFA)
Submitted: August 18, 2022 Decided: August 22, 2022
Before WYNN, THACKER, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vivek Pisal, Appellant Pro Se. Crystal L. Tyler, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Vivek Pisal appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint pursuant to
the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213, as untimely.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s judgment. Pisal v. K12, Inc., No. 1:21-cv-00506-RDA-JFA (E.D. Va.
Mar. 23, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.