The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-1445•Bianca A. Hughley v. Baltimore County Government
22-1445Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 19, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1445
BIANCA A. HUGHLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BALTIMORE COUNTY GOVERNMENT,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Lydia Kay Griggsby, District Judge. (1:19-cv-01578-LKG)
Submitted: January 17, 2023 Decided: January 19, 2023
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bianca A. Hughley, Appellant Pro Se. Andrea Danielle Smith, BALTIMORE COUNTY
OFFICE OF LAW, Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Bianca A. Hughley appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to
Defendant and dismissing her civil action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Hughley v. Baltimore Cnty. Gov’t, No. 1:19-cv-01578-
LKG (D. Md. Mar. 29, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.