Tiesha Evans; Kathy Reaves v. APRIL LEROY, Individually

22-1482Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 20, 2022

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1482
TIESHA EVANS; KATHY REAVES,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
APRIL LEROY, Individually and Professional Capacity; OFFICER MCCOLL,
Individually; CHIEF ALLEN HEIDLER; RICHARD O’MALLEY; HALL ROSS,
Individually and Professional; MOLLY SPEARMAN; TERESA MYERS ERVIN;
K. G. SMITH, JR.; MARK KEEL; HENRY MCMASTER; CHRISTOPHER
WRAY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.
Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge; Thomas E. Rogers, III, Magistrate Judge. (4:22-
cv-01150-TLW-TER)
Submitted: October 18, 2022 Decided: October 20, 2022
Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tiesha Evans and Kathy Reaves, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Tiesha Evans and Kathy Reaves seek to appeal the magistrate judge’s order
directing them to secure counsel to represent a minor child. This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Appellants seek to appeal is neither a final
order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.