The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-1506•In re: D.J.M., Party Below.
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1506
RONALD D. METCALF, Parent/advocate, legal guardian as lawful guardian ad
litem of Minor Child D. J. M.; CLAUDIA METCALF, Parent/advocate, legal
guardian as lawful guardian ad litem of Minor Child D. J. M,
Petitioners - Appellants,
and
In re: D.J.M.,
Party Below.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:22-mc-00013-MR-WCM)
Submitted: January 31, 2023 Decided: February 16, 2023
Before THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ron David Metcalf, Claudia Metcalf, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ron and Claudia Metcalf appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their “petition
for review of whole record, and for competent attorney to facilitate procedure” without
prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), imposing a pre-filing review system, and
denying their motion to recuse. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. In re Metcalf, No.
1:22-mc-00013-MR-WCM (W.D.N.C. Apr. 5 & 22, 2022). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.