Kevin Peter Fonseca v. American Red Cross

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1520
KEVIN PETER FONSECA,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
AMERICAN RED CROSS; GAIL MCGOVERN; ANGELA POWLEY; BRANDI
MCLENDON; DANIELLE BOWEN; CHRISTI MATHEWSON; DELORIS
WILBORN; AVIS BUTTS; DOES 1-25,
Defendants – Appellees.
No. 22-1534
KEVIN PETER FONSECA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
I.B.T. TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION 71; ERNEST WRENN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judges. (3:21-cv-00452-
RJC-DSC; 3:21-cv-00369-MOC-DCK)

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Submitted: October 18, 2022 Decided: October 20, 2022
Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Peter Fonseca, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua Ryan Adams, JACKSON LEWIS PC,
Charlotte, North Carolina; Trisha Suzanne Pande, PATTERSON HARKAVY, LLP,
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Kevin Peter Fonseca appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaints
that challenged the American Red Cross’ decision to terminate his employment and the
adequacy of his union’s representation in the subsequent grievance proceedings. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Fonseca v. Am. Red Cross, No. 3:21-cv-00452-RJC-DSC
(W.D.N.C. Apr. 19, 2022); Fonseca v. I.B.T. Teamsters Loc. Union 71, No. 3:21-cv-00369-
MOC-DCK (W.D.N.C. May 9, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --