Eddie Roy Jackson, Jr. v. Wilhelm Restaurant Group, Inc.; 3289 Corporation; Rosemarie Kemmer; Douglas Hewitt

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1530
EDDIE ROY JACKSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILHELM RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.; 3289 CORPORATION; ROSEMARIE
KEMMER; DOUGLAS HEWITT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Rossie David Alston, Jr., District Judge. (1:22-cv-00165-RDA-TCB)
Submitted: September 21, 2023 Decided: October 12, 2023
Before KING, HEYTENS, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eddie Roy Jackson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Morgan Palmer, Norfolk, Virginia,
Randy Carl Sparks, Jr., KAUFMAN & CANOLES, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Eddie Roy Jackson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting Appellees’ motion
to dismiss his civil complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).* We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the pending motion and affirm the
district court’s order. See Jackson v. Wilhelm Rest. Grp., Inc., No. 1:22-cv-00165-RDA-
TCB (E.D. Va. Mar. 30, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Appellees have moved to dismiss the appeal, because the notice of appeal was filed
more than 30 days after the district court’s order was entered on the docket. (ECF No. 8).
Jackson opposes the motion. (ECF No. 16). Because the district court’s order was not set
forth on a separate document, we conclude that the notice of appeal was timely filed, and
we have jurisdiction over the appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(7)(A)(ii).

-- 2 of 2 --