The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-1611•Robert Harrison Kalk v. QUINTEN MILLER, Sheriff - Buncombe County North Carolina, in his Individual
22-1611Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 15, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1611
ROBERT HARRISON KALK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
QUINTEN MILLER, Sheriff - Buncombe County North Carolina, in his Individual
and Official Capacities; JEFFREY LITTRELL, Captain - Buncombe County North
Carolina, in his Individual and Official Capacities; BUNCOMBE COUNTY
SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Asheville. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (1:22-cv-00019-MOC-WCM)
Submitted: October 25, 2022 Decided: November 15, 2022
Before AGEE and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Harrison Kalk, Appellant Pro Se. Curtis William Euler, BUNCOMBE COUNTY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Harrison Kalk appeals the district court’s order granting Appellees’ motion
to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Kalk v. Miller, No.
1:22-cv-00019-MOC-WCM (W.D.N.C. May 6, 2022). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.