The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-1636•In re: Michael Kenny Carter, a/k/a Blaze
22-1636Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 5, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1636
In re: MICHAEL KENNY CARTER, a/k/a Blaze,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:17-cr-00351-JMC-1; 3:22-cv-00635-JMC)
Submitted: July 21, 2022 Decided: August 5, 2022
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Kenny Carter, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Kenny Carter petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district
court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He seeks an order from
this court directing the district court to act. The present record does not reveal undue delay
in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition and supplemental
mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.