The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-1699•Major Mike Webb, a/k/a Major Mike Webb for Congress (H8VA08167), d/b/a Friends for… v. City of Falls Church; City of Alexandria
22-1699Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 22, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1699
MAJOR MIKE WEBB, a/k/a Major Mike Webb for Congress (H8VA08167), d/b/a
Friends for Mike Webb,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF FALLS CHURCH; CITY OF ALEXANDRIA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Michael Stefan Nachmanoff, District Judge. (1:22-cv-00668-MSN-WEF)
Submitted: December 20, 2022 Decided: December 22, 2022
Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael David Webb, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Major Mike Webb appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to proceed
in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons. Webb v. City of Falls Church, 1:22-cv-00668-MSN-WEF (E.D.
Va. June 17, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.