In re: Jamar Holt

22-1708Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 25, 2022

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1708
In re: JAMAR HOLT,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (8:13-cr-00204-DKC-4)
Submitted: August 15, 2022 Decided: August 25, 2022
Before AGEE and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jamar Holt, Petitioner Pro Se. Elizabeth G. Wright, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Jamar Holt petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging unreasonable delay by the
district court in acting on his motion to file an amended motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255, as supplemented. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to
act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied Holt’s
supplemented motion on August 8, 2022. Accordingly, because the district court has
recently ruled on Holt’s motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We deny Holt’s
motion to dismiss appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.