The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-1718•Woodrow R. Jackson, Sr. v. Hon. Donald C. Blessing
22-1718Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 26, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1718
WOODROW R. JACKSON, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HON. DONALD C. BLESSING; LYNETTE COE; MACHELLE EPPES; J.
DUNCAN PITCHFORD; JASON S. MIYARES; JOHN W. DANIEL, II; THOMAS
(Tommy) W. LAWSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. David J. Novak, District Judge. (3:21-cv-00772-DJN)
Submitted: May 19, 2023 Decided: July 26, 2023
Before THACKER and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Woodrow R. Jackson, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. John P. O’Herron, THOMPSON
MCMULLAN PC, Richmond, Virginia; James Arthur Cales, III, FURNISS, DAVIS,
RASHKIND & SAUNDERS, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Woodrow R. Jackson, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing without
prejudice his civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Jackson v. Blessing, No. 3:21-cv-00772-DJN (E.D. Va. June 13, 2022). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.