The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-1739•Clothilda Williams v. Officer Berger
22-1739Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 22, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1739
CLOTHILDA WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER BERGER; SERGEANT ENGLISH; OFFICER JENNINGS, Crash Crew
Investigator; JOHN DOE; JOHN DOE; JOHN DOE; HENRICO POLICE
DEPARTMENT; VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER COMPANY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:22-cv-00433-JAG)
Submitted: November 17, 2022 Decided: November 22, 2022
Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clothilda Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Clothilda Williams appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.