The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-1805•In re: Kenneth Kennedy Shannon, a/k/a James Smith, a/k/a Kevin Sanders
22-1805Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 13, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1805
In re: KENNETH KENNEDY SHANNON, a/k/a James Smith, a/k/a Kevin
Sanders,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(2:13-cr-00977-DCN-8; 2:19-cv-02888-DCN)
Submitted: December 1, 2022 Decided: December 13, 2022
Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth Kennedy Shannon, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Kennedy Shannon petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the
district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He seeks an order
from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket
reveals that the district court has denied relief on Shannon’s § 2255 motion. United
States v. Shannon, No. 2:13-cr-00977-DCN-8 (D.S.C. Oct. 27, 2022). Accordingly,
because the district court has recently decided Shannon’s case, we deny the mandamus
petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.