The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-1818•In re: Catherine Denise Randolph
22-1818Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 17, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1818
In re: CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,
Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:15-mc-00369)
Submitted: December 15, 2022 Decided: December 19, 2022
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge and WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s order returning her pleadings
because the pleadings did not comply with the prefiling injunction and did not state a
plausible cause of action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.