The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-1855•Melvin McCoy Jerman v. at&tcorporation
22-1855Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 18, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1855
MELVIN MCCOY JERMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
AT&T CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:20-cv-00384-MOC-DSC)
Submitted: February 16, 2023 Decided: February 21, 2023
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, RUSHING, Circuit Judge, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Melvin McCoy Jerman, Appellant Pro Se. David A. Grassi, Jr., ECHOLS FIRM, LLC,
Rock Hill, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Melvin McCoy Jerman appeals the district court’s order granting summary
judgment to AT&T Corporation (“AT&T”) in Jerman’s civil action. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Jerman v. AT&T, No. 3:20-cv-00384-MOC-DSC (W.D.N.C. July 20,
2022). We deny AT&T’s motion to strike Jerman’s pro se supplemental brief. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.