The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-1944•In re: Ramone Stephon Jones, a/k/a Duggie
22-1944Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 1, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1944
In re: RAMONE STEPHON JONES, a/k/a Duggie,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (8:03-cr-00321-DKC-3)
Submitted: February 28, 2023 Decided: April 3, 2023
Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ramone Stephon Jones, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ramone Stephon Jones petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district
court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), or, in the alternative, a sentence reduction under Section 404 of the
First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222. He seeks an order from this
court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals
that the district court recently decided Jones’ motion. United States v. Jones, No. 8:03-cr-
00321-DKC-3 (D. Md. Jan. 3, 2023). Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as
moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.