Adam K. Pearson v. Robinhood Markets, Inc.; Vladimir Tenev; Baiju Bhatt

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1956
ADAM K. PEARSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ROBINHOOD MARKETS, INC.; VLADIMIR TENEV; BAIJU BHATT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:22-cv-00533-JAG)
Submitted: January 13, 2023 Decided: February 2, 2023
Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Adam K. Pearson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Adam K. Pearson appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint
without prejudice and for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See
Pearson v. Robinhood Mkts., Inc., No. 3:22-cv-00533-JAG (E.D. Va. Aug. 8, 2022;
Aug. 9, 2022). We also deny Pearson’s “Untitled Motion for Appropriate Relief.” We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --