The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-2008•Frank Latham Hinton v. Ernesto Luciano-Perez, M.d.
22-2008Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 19, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-2008
FRANK LATHAM HINTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ERNESTO LUCIANO-PEREZ, M.D.; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS; INVESTIGATOR FOR THE
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. (2:22-cv-00150-RBS-LRL)
Submitted: January 17, 2023 Decided: January 19, 2023
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frank Latham Hinton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Frank Latham Hinton appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil
complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) and denying
his request that the district judge recuse herself. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hinton
v. Luciano-Perez, No. 2:22-cv-00150-RBS-LRL (E.D. Va. Sept. 9, 2022). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.