The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-2084•Cavour Ndam v. Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft, a/k/a Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft Inc.
22-2084Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 22, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-2084
CAVOUR NDAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, a/k/a Deutsche Lufthansa
Aktiengesellschaft Inc.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Patricia Tolliver Giles, District Judge. (1:21-cv-01258-PTG-WEF)
Submitted: February 7, 2023 Decided: June 22, 2023
Before GREGORY, Chief Circuit Judge, and WILKINSON and RUSHING, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cavour Ndam, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Michael Stern, SCHNADER, HARRISON,
SEGAL & LEWIS LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Cavour Ndam appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint based
on its finding that Ndam committed fraud on the court. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Ndam v.
Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft, No. 1:21-cv-01258-PTG-WEF (E.D. Va. Sept. 15,
2022). We deny Ndam’s motion to supplement the record on appeal by uploading digital
audio recordings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.