Irvin J. Betch; Patricia A. Betch v. Attorney Maurice W. O’brien

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-2108
IRVIN J. BETCH; PATRICIA A. BETCH,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
ATTORNEY MAURICE W. O’BRIEN; ATTORNEY DIANE SALLY ROSENBERG;
ATTORNEY CRISTIAN ALEC MENDOZA; ATTORNEY MARK D. MEYER;
BALTIMORE HOME WHOLESALERS, LLC; ROSENBERG & ASSOCIATES, LLC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:22-cv-00894-PX)
Submitted: March 16, 2023 Decided: March 20, 2023
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Irvin J. Betch and Patricia A. Betch, Appellants Pro Se. Sara Nicholson Tussey,
ROSENBERG & ASSOCIATES, LLC, Bethesda, Maryland; Byron L. Huffman, BYRON
L. HUFFMAN, PC, Columbia, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Irvin and Patricia Betch appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint as barred by res judicata and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Betch v. O’Brien,
No. 8:22-cv-00894-PX (D. Md. Aug. 18, 2022; Sept. 15, 2022). Additionally, we deny the
pending motion for judicial notice. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --