The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-2182•Mithun Banerjee v. Bank of America, N.a.
22-2182Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 2, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-2182
MITHUN BANERJEE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; VIVIANA QUISHPE-NARVAEZ; THE
CORPORATION TRUST, INCORPORATED; TESSA L. FREDERICK;
JEFFREY P. REILLY; MILES & STOCKBRIDGE P. C., 100 Light Street,
Baltimore Md 21202; ROSALYN TANG; STEPHEN J. MCAULIFFE, III;
MILES & STOCKBRIDGE P. C., 11 N Washington St #700, Rockville, MD 20850,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:21-cv-03110-TDC)
Submitted: October 31, 2023 Decided: November 2, 2023
Before HARRIS and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mithun Banerjee, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mithun Banerjee appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint
and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders.
Banerjee v. Bank of Am., N.A., No. 8:21-cv-03110-TDC (D. Md. Aug. 4, 2022, and Oct. 12,
2022). We also deny Banerjee’s motion to assign counsel. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.