Veronica Del Carmen Lopez-Urbina; M.u.l. v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General

22-2201Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 12, 2023

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-2201
VERONICA DEL CARMEN LOPEZ-URBINA; M.U.L.,
Petitioners,
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: August 18, 2023 Decided: October 12, 2023
Before AGEE and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Leonel Vasquez, Hyattsville, Maryland, for Petitioners. Brian M. Boynton,
Acting Assistant Attorney General, Sarah A. Bryd, Senior Litigation Counsel, James A.
Hurley, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Veronica Del Carmen Lopez-Urbina and her minor child, natives and citizens of El
Salvador, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board)
dismissing Lopez-Urbina’s appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of her applications
for asylum and withholding of removal. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and
conclude that the evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative
factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial evidence supports the
denial of relief, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we
deny the petition for review. In re Lopez-Urbina (B.I.A. Nov. 1, 2022). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.