The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-2257•Helene McCarthy-Staples v. M. Bradley Brickhouse
22-2257Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 23, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-2257
HELENE MCCARTHY-STAPLES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
M. BRADLEY BRICKHOUSE; COLLEEN T. DICKERSON; FRANK J.
DRISCOLL, JR.; LISA A. BROCCOLETTI; MARLANDE SLEDGE; SUSANNE
FERRANTELLI; PAMELA JACK; ALICIA R. WELLONS; TABETHA L.
TURNER; CHRISTIANNA DOUGHERTY-CUNNINGHAM; MARK D. STILES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Elizabeth W. Hanes, District Judge. (2:21-cv-00383-EWH-RJK)
Submitted: February 21, 2023 Decided: February 23, 2023
Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Helene McCarthy-Staples, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Helene McCarthy-Staples appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and declining to exercise
supplemental jurisdiction over her state law claims. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
McCarthy-Staples v. Brickhouse, No. 2:21-cv-00383-EWH-RJK (E.D. Va. Nov. 22, 2022).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.