Mithun Banerjee v. Allstate Property

22-2318Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 30, 2023

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-2318
MITHUN BANERJEE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY;
ALLSTATE PROPERTY & ALLSTATE INDEMNITY; ALLSTATE
INDEMNITY COMPANY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Stephanie A. Gallagher, District Judge. (1:21-cv-02296-SAG)
Submitted: September 28, 2023 Decided: October 2, 2023
Before NIEMEYER, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mithun Banerjee, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Mithun Banerjee appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his amended
complaint and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Banerjee’s motion
to appoint counsel and affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.