The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6004•United States of America v. Sean Rondell Bundy, a/k/a Bun Rock, a/k/a Humps
22-6004Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 24, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6004
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
SEAN RONDELL BUNDY, a/k/a Bun Rock, a/k/a Humps,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:08-cr-00226-JKB-1)
Submitted: September 22, 2022 Decided: September 26, 2022
Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sean Rondell Bundy, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Sean Rondell Bundy appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P.
36 motion to correct clerical errors in his plea agreement and presentence report. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Vanderhorst, 927
F.3d 824, 826 (4th Cir. 2019) (stating standard). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. United States v. Bundy, No. 1:08-cr-00226-JKB-1 (D. Md. Dec. 1, 2021). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.