United States of America v. Randall Lee Conrad

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6007
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RANDALL LEE CONRAD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:04-cr-00297-NCT-1)
Submitted: January 17, 2023 Decided: January 20, 2023
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randall Lee Conrad, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Randall Lee Conrad appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. We review a district court’s denial of
a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d
326, 329 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). We have reviewed the record and
conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in determining that Conrad failed to
show extraordinary and compelling circumstances warranting release. See United States
v. High, 997 F.3d 181, 188-91 (4th Cir. 2021) (discussing amount of explanation required
for denial of compassionate release motion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. United States v. Conrad, No. 1:04-cr-00297-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 30, 2021). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --