The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6050•Eric Martin Pepke v. R. WILSON, Acting Warden PEX
22-6050Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 13, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6050
ERIC MARTIN PEPKE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
R. WILSON, Acting Warden PEX,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-00007-TSE-TCB)
Submitted: September 8, 2022 Decided: September 13, 2022
Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric Martin Pepke, Appellant Pro Se. Marc Birnbaum, Special Assistant United States
Attorney, Tony Ray Roberts, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Eric Martin Pepke appeals the district court’s order denying relief without prejudice
on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which he sought to challenge his criminal judgment by
way of the savings clause in 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Having reviewed the record and finding no
reversible error, we affirm the decision of the district court. Pepke v. Wilson, No. 1:21-cv-
00007-TSE-TCB (E.D. Va. Dec. 17, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.