The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6080•Carnell Dion McElroy, Sr. v. HAROLD CLARKE, Director of D.O.C.
22-6080Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 8, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6080
CARNELL DION MCELROY, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of D.O.C.; GREGORY L. HOLLOWAY; WARDEN
KAISER; I.M.P. BAKER; I.M.P. SYKES; C. CAUTHORNE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. (7:21-cv-00091-JPJ-PMS)
Submitted: August 12, 2022 Decided: September 8, 2022
Before WYNN and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carnell Dion McElroy, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Carnell Dion McElroy, Sr., appeals the district court’s order and judgment granting
the Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion for failure to state a claim. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See McElroy v.
Clarke, No. 7:21-cv-00091-JPJ-PMS (W.D. Va. Jan. 3, 2022). We deny the motions for
appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.