The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6094•United States of America v. Darrin Howard Merritt
22-6094Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 12, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6094
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DARRIN HOWARD MERRITT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:12-cr-00209-FL-1)
Submitted: June 14, 2023 Decided: July 12, 2023
Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darrin Howard Merritt, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Darrin Howard Merritt appeals the district court’s order dismissing his motion for
an award of $500 in “gate money” on his release from prison without prejudice for lack of
jurisdiction. The district court determined the Director of the Bureau of Prisons has the
exclusive authority to determine the discretionary gratuity up to $500 that may be provided
under the statute. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See 18 U.S.C.
§ 3624(d)(2); 28 C.F.R. § 571.20; cf. Murray Energy Corp. v. Adm’r of EPA, 861 F.3d 529,
537 & n.4 (4th Cir. 2017). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United
States v. Merritt, No. 5:12-cr-00209-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 22, 2021). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.