The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6123•Jeremy Shane Cochran v. Sarah Panardi; Misty Gothrie; Gary Sindy; Lt. Vaughn Whiteman; John G. Sindy
22-6123Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 1, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6123
JEREMY SHANE COCHRAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SARAH PANARDI; MISTY GOTHRIE; GARY SINDY; LT. VAUGHN
WHITEMAN; JOHN G. SINDY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, Senior District Judge. (1:20-cv-03695-RDB)
Submitted: June 28, 2022 Decided: July 1, 2022
Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeremy Shane Cochran, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jeremy Shane Cochran appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants
summary judgment in Cochran’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Cochran v. Panardi, No. 1:20-cv-03695-RDB (D. Md. Dec. 1, 2021).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.