The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6129•United States of America v. Corey Mayo
22-6129Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 20, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6129
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
COREY MAYO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:14-cr-00081-HEH-DJN-1)
Submitted: October 18, 2022 Decided: October 20, 2022
Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Corey Mayo, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Corey Mayo appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for
compassionate release. We have reviewed the record on appeal and conclude that the
district court did not abuse its discretion in denying relief. See United States v. Kibble, 992
F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (providing standard), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021).
Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Mayo, No. 3:14-cr-00081-HEH-DJN-1 (E.D. Va.
Jan. 20, 2022). We deny Mayo’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.