The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6164•United States of America v. Antonio Rodriguez Cross
22-6164Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 27, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6164
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ CROSS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:16-cr-00286-FL-1)
Submitted: August 17, 2022 Decided: August 29, 2022
Before AGEE, HARRIS, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antonio Rodriguez Cross, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua Bryan Royster, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Antonio Rodriguez Cross appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). Upon review of the
record, we discern no abuse of discretion in the district court’s determination that the
pertinent 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors weighed against compassionate release. See United
States v. High, 997 F.3d 181, 185 (4th Cir. 2021) (providing standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.