The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6182•Robert King Via, Jr. v. BETH CABELL, Warden of Sussex II State Prison; OFFICER VANDERMARK; OFFICER R. JOHNSON
22-6182Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 26, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6182
ROBERT KING VIA, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BETH CABELL, Warden of Sussex II State Prison; OFFICER VANDERMARK;
OFFICER R. JOHNSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. David J. Novak, District Judge. (3:20-cv-00511-DJN-EWH)
Submitted: July 21, 2022 Decided: July 26, 2022
Before MOTZ, HARRIS, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert King Via, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert King Via, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint pursuant to its screening obligation under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Via v. Cabell, No. 3:20-cv-00511-DJN-EWH (E.D.
Va. Jan. 26, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.