The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6249•United States of America v. Earl Whittley Davis, a/k/a Baby Earl, a/k/a E
22-6249Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 27, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6249
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
EARL WHITTLEY DAVIS, a/k/a Baby Earl, a/k/a E,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:07-cr-00199-DKC-1)
Submitted: April 25, 2023 Decided: April 27, 2023
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER, Circuit Judge, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Earl Whittley Davis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Earl Whittley Davis appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
reconsideration of the denial of his motion for compassionate release. We review a district
court’s denial of a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States v.
Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Davis, No. 8:07-cr-00199-DKC-1 (D. Md.
Feb. 7, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.