The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6251•Kevin Tolbert v. Warden; Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons
22-6251Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 26, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6251
KEVIN TOLBERT,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN; DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Stephanie A. Gallagher, District Judge. (1:21-cv-00179-SAG)
Submitted: April 28, 2022 Decided: May 26, 2022
Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Tolbert, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kevin Tolbert, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on
his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and a subsequent order denying Tolbert’s motions to
reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm because, as the district court concluded, the Bureau of Prisons’ current calculations
of his sentence are correct. Tolbert v. Warden, No. 1:21-cv-00179-SAG (D. Md. Feb. 7,
2022 & Feb. 18, 2022). We also deny Tolbert’s motion to appoint counsel and deny as
moot his motion to expedite the briefing schedule. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.