United States of America v. Oscar Antonio Grande, a/k/a Pantera

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6258
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
OSCAR ANTONIO GRANDE, a/k/a Pantera,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Rossie David Alston, Jr., District Judge. (1:04-cr-00283-RDA-2)
Submitted: December 15, 2022 Decided: December 19, 2022
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Lana Manitta, LAW OFFICE OF LANA MANITTA, PLLC, Purcellville,
Virginia, for Appellant. Jessica D. Aber, United States Attorney, Joseph Attias, Assistant
United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Oscar Antonio Grande appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release, brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the
First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. After
reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in
denying Grande’s motion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (per
curiam) (stating standard of review), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Grande, No. 1:04-cr-00283-RDA-2 (E.D.
Va. filed Feb. 8, 2022 & entered Feb. 10, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --