The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6337•Leanthony T. Winston v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia D.O.C.
22-6337Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 13, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6337
LEANTHONY T. WINSTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia D.O.C.; RENALD MEYERS,
Superintendent of Hampton Roads Regional Jail; CARL MANIS, Warden of
Wallens Ridge,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:17-cv-00566-RGD-DEM)
Submitted: September 8, 2022 Decided: September 13, 2022
Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
LeAnthony T. Winston, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
LeAnthony T. Winston appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for
entry of a default judgment and his subsequent motion to alter or amend the judgment. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Winston v. Clarke, No. 2:17-cv-00566-RGD-DEM
(E.D. Va. Feb. 2, 2022; filed Mar. 11, 2022 & entered Mar. 14, 2022). We further deny
Winston’s motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.