Florence Bikundi v. R. MCCAFFREY, Warden FCI/SFF

22-6348Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 29, 2022

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6348
FLORENCE BIKUNDI,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
R. MCCAFFREY, Warden FCI/SFF,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Wheeling. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (5:21-cv-00204-JPB-JPM)
Submitted: July 26, 2022 Decided: July 29, 2022
Before MOTZ, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Florence Bikundi, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Florence Bikundi, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing
with prejudice her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order, Bikundi v. McCaffrey,
No. 5:21-cv-00204-JPB-JPM (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 10, 2022), but modify the order to reflect
that the dismissal is without prejudice. See S. Walk at Broadlands Homeowner’s Ass’n,
Inc. v. OpenBand at Broadlands, LLC, 713 F.3d 175, 185 (4th Cir. 2013) (“A dismissal for
lack of . . . subject matter jurisdiction . . . must be one without prejudice, because a court
that lacks jurisdiction has no power to adjudicate and dispose of a claim on the merits.”);
Moss v. Harwood, 19 F.4th 614, 623 n.3 (4th Cir. 2021) (noting district court’s dismissal
without prejudice of prisoner’s civil rights claim for failure to exhaust administrative
remedies was “[c]onsistent with precedent” and citing cases). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.