The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6355•Jason Ernest Chappell v. Officer Franklin
22-6355Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 24, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6355
JASON ERNEST CHAPPELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER FRANKLIN; LT. SWETT; SGT. DEAVER; DEBRA A. HARDEN;
SHARON HOBBS; JONATHAN SUMMERLIN; ANN H. DAVENPORT; LORIS
SUTTON; FENTRESS BRYANT,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
CAROLINAS MEDICAL CENTER; JAMES ALDER; MEDICAL SERVICE
SYSTEM,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:18-ct-03363-D)
Submitted: November 22, 2022 Decided: November 28, 2022
Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Jason Ernest Chappell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Jason Ernest Chappell appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants
summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Chappell’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm. Chappell
v. Franklin, No. 5:18-ct-03363-D (E.D.N.C. Dec. 15, 2021). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.