The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6398•United States of America v. Adam Lawrence Randolph, Iv
22-6398Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 29, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6398
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ADAM LAWRENCE RANDOLPH, IV,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:18-cr-00340-MOC-DSC-1)
Submitted: July 26, 2022 Decided: July 29, 2022
Before MOTZ, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Adam Lawrence Randolph, IV, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Adam Lawrence Randolph, IV, appeals the district court’s order denying his
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. After reviewing the record,
we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Randolph’s
motion. See United States v. High, 997 F.3d 181, 185 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of
review). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Randolph, No. 3:18-cr-00340-MOC-DSC-1 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 17, 2022).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.