The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6414•United States of America v. Daryl F. Locust, a/k/a Derek Locust, a/k/a 8, a/k/a Daryl Frank Locusts
22-6414Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 24, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6414
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DARYL F. LOCUST, a/k/a Derek Locust, a/k/a 8, a/k/a Daryl Frank Locusts,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. (4:06-cr-00040-RBS-TEM-
1)
Submitted: November 22, 2022 Decided: November 28, 2022
Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daryl F. Locust, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Daryl F. Locust appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for
compassionate release and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record
on appeal and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying relief.
See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (providing standard), cert. denied,
142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Locust, No. 4:06-cr-
00040-RBS-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 16, 2022, & May 5, 2022). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.