The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6483•William Alva Hemming v. C.O. B. HAWERD; C.O. J. KISH; C.O. C. BENETTE; HAZELTON FCI; DR. MYERS, Psychology
22-6483Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 10, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6483
WILLIAM ALVA HEMMING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
C.O. B. HAWERD; C.O. J. KISH; C.O. C. BENETTE; HAZELTON FCI; DR.
MYERS, Psychology,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Wheeling. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (5:21-cv-00071-JPB-JPM)
Submitted: July 31, 2023 Decided: November 9, 2023
Before WYNN and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Alva Hemming, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Alva Hemming appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his
complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm. Hemming v. Hawerd, No. 5:21-cv-00071-JPB-JPM (N.D.W. Va.
Mar. 10, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.