The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6558•United States of America v. Rahkeem Lee Mcdonald, a/k/a Hitman, a/k/a Big Keem
22-6558Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 27, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6558
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RAHKEEM LEE MCDONALD, a/k/a Hitman, a/k/a Big Keem,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:14-cr-00229-MOC-DCK-12)
Submitted: September 22, 2022 Decided: September 27, 2022
Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rahkeem Lee McDonald, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rahkeem Lee McDonald appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a
sentence reduction pursuant to § 404(b) of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391,
132 Stat. 5194, 5222. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. McDonald, No. 3:14-cr-00229-MOC-DCK-12
(W.D.N.C. Apr. 25, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.