The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6568•James R. Heuss, Ii v. ELIZABETH A. HILL, Executive Director; CARLOS DEL TORO, Secretary of the Navy
22-6568Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 2, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6568
JAMES R. HEUSS, II,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ELIZABETH A. HILL, Executive Director; CARLOS DEL TORO, Secretary of
the Navy,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:21-cv-00662-LMB-JFA)
Submitted: June 9, 2023 Decided: September 5, 2023
Before AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James R. Heuss, II, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew James Mezger, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James R. Heuss, II, appeals the district court’s order awarding summary judgment
to the defendants on his claims under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.
§§ 701-706, and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. We have reviewed the
record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Heuss v. Hill, 1:21-cv-00662-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. Feb. 28, 2022). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.