The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-6581•Lawrence Jones v. LT. B. JENKINS; C. ORD, Officer; H. BURKETT, Officer; LEVENE, Officer
22-6581Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 24, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6581
LAWRENCE JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LT. B. JENKINS; C. ORD, Officer; H. BURKETT, Officer; LEVENE, Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Wheeling. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (5:22-cv-00024-JPB-JPM)
Submitted: June 22, 2023 Decided: June 26, 2023
Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his
Bivens* action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. On appeal, we confine our
review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Jones’
informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has
forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177
(4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules,
our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we deny Jones’
motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s order. Jones v. Jenkins,
No. 5:22-cv-00024-JPB-JPM (N.D.W Va., Apr. 26, 2022). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388
(1971).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.