Paul D. Shegonee v. Warden Streeval

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6612
PAUL D. SHEGONEE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN STREEVAL,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Chief District Judge. (7:21-cv-00162-MFU-PMS)
Submitted: August 8, 2023 Decided: August 11, 2023
Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul D. Shegonee, Appellant Pro Se. S. Cagle Juhan, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Paul D. Shegonee, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for lack of jurisdiction. In light of the Supreme Court’s recent
decision in Jones v. Hendrix, 143 S. Ct. 1857, 1868-69 (2023) (holding that petitioner
cannot use § 2241 petition by way of the savings clause in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e) to mount
successive collateral attack on validity of federal conviction), we conclude that Shegonee
cannot pursue his claim in a § 2241 petition.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order dismissing Shegonee’s § 2241
petition. Shegonee v. Streeval, No. 7:21-cv-00162-MFU-PMS (W.D. Va. May 3, 2022).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --